Tigray Conflict: Media Warfare to Protect the Villain

Yellow journalism, a practice usually characterized by sensational reports and media coverage of dubious accuracy and taste, has been widely practiced by both mainstream as well as social media outlets during wartimes and conflicts. Such reports resort to eye-catching headlines; exaggerate news events, and treat news in an unprofessional and unethical manner. Sensationalism is mainly intended to gain a huge number of readers and viewers and thereby promote a certain agenda to influence or rather hoodwink the audiences. Media coverage of the conflict in Tigray Region of Ethiopia is a typical case in point.

Most often, “ war crime, gang rape, ethnic cleansing, blockade, and looting” are terms associated with the ongoing Tigray conflict. The excessive hyperbole that is gratuitously invoked without rigorous examination of facts on the ground, and its timing, invariably invoked whenever the TPLF is on the back foot, indeed belie a sinister political agenda of external intervention designed to salvage the culpable party. Furthermore, most of the reports by media and “Rights Groups” are done from outside Tigray by consulting people affiliated to the TPLF. Hence, a person or a group who has never been to Tigray since the start of the war cannot come up with a concrete and empirical report that reflects the actual reality on the ground.

An illustrative example of such reporting is a self-contradictory article entitled, ‘Ethiopia’s Invisible Ethnic Cleansing – The World Can’t Afford to Ignore Tigray’, written by Agnes Callamard of Amnesty International and Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch on Foreign Affairs on June 2, 2022.

This article has made several allegations of abuses, but, paradoxically, it made the following statement as well: ‘…many of these abuses have been hidden from view. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s government has imposed communication restrictions throughout Tigray and obstructed the efforts of independent investigators, journalists, and humanitarian workers, making it difficult to verify accounts from the region.’

If it is indeed difficult to verify purported “accounts of abuses” in the region, how can the authors justify their outrageous allegations without minimum validation and verification? This fact alone renders their report a mere diatribe of “activists and militants” rather than an objective and professional account of facts and events gauged through established procedures, norms and metrics of humanitarian laws of war.

The article is also guilty of gross omission of key facts and events. It glosses over the cardinal question on the causes of the war. Long before the war broke out, TPLF was preparing for the offensive, covertly as well as overtly. The indelible fact is that TPLF launched pre-meditated, massive and coordinated attacks on all the positions of Ethiopia’s Northern Command on the night of November 3, 2020. TPLF wrongly believed that it could neutralize the Northern Command, and seize all its heavy weaponry which constituted 80% of Ethiopia’s total arsenal in its blitzkrieg. In addition to this, in launching its war of choice, the TPLF’s twin objectives were to seize power in Ethiopia and to pursue its hostile agenda “of territorial expansion” against Eritrea.

Most mainstream media reports of the conflict do not only lack depth and objectivity, largely carried out as they are through remote sensing, but they also ignore reality and context. In this perspective, they totally ignore or do not take into account the TPLF’s crimes in the Amhara and Afar regions. For instance, TPLF soldiers deliberately massacred dozens of civilians, raped women and underage girls, and vandalized civilian as well as public properties when they seized control of the town of Kobo in the Amhara region.

In the event, TPLF and its handlers do not have any moral ground to accuse other parties on the basis of fallacious allegations. TPLF, an organization designated as a terrorist group by the Ethiopian government, should be accountable for all the miseries the people of Tigray facing today. In addition to their past miscalculations, TPLF leaders are beating war drums and instilling siege mentality on Tigrayan society to perpetuate the sufferings of the people of Tigray. However, these are issues willfully ignored by most mainstream media outlets that are largely at the beck and call of the TPLF’s principal Enablers.

Nonetheless, there are a handful of reporters covering the situation in Tigray objectively and professionally, by travelling to the battle grounds and through extensive contacts and validation of testimonial and other evidences. An article entitled, US Threatening Ethiopia and Eritrea with Illegal “Designation of Genocide”, written by Ann Garrison on May 26, 2022 underscored the reality of unhindered flow of humanitarian aid into Tigray region to the world. She wrote her article by travelling to the Afar region of Ethiopia.

In her article, Ann Garrison asked New Zealand journalist Alastair Thompson, who had recently travelled to Ethiopia’s Afar region, to describe the aid convoys he saw while travelling to a town found on the border between Afar and Tigray. He described the situation as follows:

On the way I saw a large number of trucks driving up. We drove past them because they were traveling more slowly than we were. And on the following day, when we returned, we saw more trucks traveling up and we also saw a large convoy staged at Silsa, about maybe 100 kilometers from Semara that was about to depart from Mekelle.

He, furthermore, testified that, . . . after the convoys depart from Silsa, the security is fairly simple. There are a series of checkpoints, not that many of them, at different intervals along the road manned by the Afar. There’s no sign of the Ethiopian army in the area. And there seems to be a very orderly running of the convoys.

The stark difference between media willful distortion and fact-based, objective reporting largely mirrors the distinct political agenda of different players.

The situation transcends normal “fog of war”, or inevitable inaccuracies that stem from issues of access and/or paucity of information. The distorted portrayal of facts and events; the gratuitous use of defamatory terms without irrefutable evidences; are indeed derivatives and manifestations of the Revisionist Narrative that TPLF Enablers have been pushing to portray the villain as the victim to pave the ground for its eventual rehabilitation.

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea

Mr. Zeru Woldemicael passed away

The General Manager of the National Insurance Corporation, Mr. Zeru Woldemicael passed away on 7 June at the age of 72 due to long illness.

Mr. Zeru Woldemicael after working in various countries in the insurance sector worked as General Manager of the National Insurance Corporation of Eritrea since 1991 and played pivotal role in the establishment and expansion of the corporation through popularization of judicious packages for lower segments of the society.

Mr. Zeru Woldemicael is survived by his wife and four children.

The funeral service of Mr. Zeru was conducted today, 8 June at the Tsetserat Cemetery in Asmara.

Expressing deep sorrow on the passing away of Mr. Zeru Woldemicael, the National Insurance Corporation expressed condolence to family and friends.

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea

One Earth, Our Environment, Our Home

Earlier this week, the international community came together to commemorate World Environment Day (WED). The historical roots of WED can be traced back to 1972 and the first United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, held in Stockholm. This inaugural gathering, which was convened under the theme, “Only One Earth”, put sustainable development firmly on the global agenda, marked the start of a dialogue between industrialized and developing countries on the links between economic growth, the pollution of the air, water, and the ocean, and the well-being of people around the world, and would lead to the establishment of WED.

Led by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP; the leading global environmental authority) and held annually on 5 June since 1973, WED has gradually grown into becoming the largest global platform for environmental public outreach and it provides a key means for raising vital awareness of the multifaceted problems that face our environment, such as air pollution, plastic pollution, the illegal trade in wildlife, sustainable consumption, sea-level increase, and food security, among others. Recognized and celebrated by millions of people in countries across the world, WED also helps to drive positive change in consumption patterns and in national and international environmental policy.

50 years on from that landmark gathering in Stockholm, concern about environmental issues remains as pertinent as ever. At present, the world is confronted by the daunting triple planetary crisis of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss, and pollution and waste. As a global community, we are utilizing the equivalent of 1.6 Earths to maintain our current way of life (although, of course, there are vast discrepancies between, and even within, countries), and ecosystems cannot keep up with our ever-growing demands. Research conducted by UNEP and other respected entities indicates that despite a brief recent fall in global carbon dioxide emissions – linked to reductions in human activities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic – the world is still on course for a potentially catastrophic temperature rise this century and remains woefully off track in meeting the Paris Agreement goals of limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and reaching net-zero carbon dioxide emissions globally by 2050. (In fact, according to an analysis by Climate Action Tracker not a single country is on pace to meet the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5°C warming, which is the limit of safety, according to scientists.) Furthermore, according to the World Health Organization, 24 percent of all global deaths, roughly 13.7 million deaths a year, are linked to the environment due to risks such as air pollution and chemical exposure.

Like in many other countries, WED was celebrated across Eritrea during the past week. At a lively public event in Asmara, the capital, Tesfai Ghebreselassie, the Minister of Land, Water and Environment, delivered a thoughtful opening message, followed by several brief presentations that detailed some of the major environmental issues that face the nation. Additionally, a multiday competition on general knowledge about pressing environmental issues was broadcast on national television, with participants representing different government institutions and offices. Then, on 5 June, people of all ages residing in various municipalities collectively rolled up their sleeves and took part in community cleaning and sanitation activities, reflecting the strong national commitment to establishing a clean, more sustainable society and demonstrating solidarity with the international community in the fight against the causes of global environmental problems.

While these recent local events were directly connected to the occasion of WED, concern for the natural environment runs deep in Eritrea and efforts to develop a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment are longstanding.

For instance, Eritrea’s National Charter, adopted in 1994 in the historic city of Nakfa, states that “We are committed to economic growth but in conjunction with social justice and the protection of the natural environment.” The Charter also declares that one of the country’s objectives is to gradually, “Build a strong national economy, based on appropriate agricultural, industrial, commercial and other services, which satisfies the needs of our people, develops our own resources, and enables responsible utilization of the natural environment and resources.”

Moreover, Eritrea has signed or is party to numerous environment-, climate change-, and biodiversity-related international agreements and instruments, including, among others, the: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (acceded 24 April 1995); Convention on Biological Diversity (approved March 1996); United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/ or Desertification, Particularly in Africa (signed 14 October 1994 and ratified 14 August 1996); World Heritage Convention (accepted 24 October 2001); Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (acceded 10 March 2005); Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity (acceded 10 March 2005); Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (acceded 28 July 2005); Paris Agreement (signed 22 April 2016); Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (accepted 3 May 2018); Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (acceded 13 March 2019).

In addition, protective and restorative environmental activities, along with climate change mitigation and adaptation actions, are conducted nationwide. It is worth noting here that many initiatives and actions are actually decades old, predating the country’s independence and having been promoted by the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF) during the long struggle for freedom.

Renewable energy continues to be prioritized (which will help to minimize the dependence on unsustainable imported fossil fuels and reduce emissions from national power generation), while tangible steps are being taken to improve energy efficiency and promote clean alternatives in transport, manufacturing, and household consumption. A number of projects are also in place to conserve, restore, and enhance natural areas, including regular nationwide afforestation campaigns involving the participation of communities, students, and youth groups, as well as water and soil conservation programs. The government (consistent with actions taken by the EPLF) has also banned the hunting and trapping of wild animals, declared areas of the Red Sea coast as protected marine reserves, and set aside large parts of the country as protected national parks.

One unique national intervention has been the introduction of improved traditional stoves, locally known as “Adhanet”, which are energy efficient (decreasing consumption by an estimated 50 percent), minimize deforestation, and reduce safety and health hazards. Designed by the Ministry of Energy and Mines and distributed by the Ministry of Agriculture, approximately 170,000 of these units have been installed in households and communities nationwide since 1998.

Another encouraging initiative has been the effort to combat pollution from plastic bags. In early 2002, plastic bags were banned from Asmara, following bans in other large urban areas, including Keren and Dekemhare. Then in 2004, the government enacted a national legal notice to ban plastic bags throughout the country. The ban, which came into effect nationally in January 2005, outlawed the import, production, sale, or distribution of plastic bags, and was characterized by stiff fines (mainly directed at producers and distributors). The step to ban plastic bags made Eritrea one of the first countries in all of Africa, and one of the few anywhere in the world, to do so.

Beyond the enactment of a legal notice, various ministries and organizations have worked together to educate the public about the importance of protecting the environment and the significant damage caused by plastic bags. Early on, community administrators discussed how bags were being eaten by goats, cows, and sheep, causing many to die, and thus helped increase support for the move among numerous rural communities and farmers. As well, national radio, television, and newspapers promote positive environmental habits, while young Eritreans continue to be taught about the need for sustainable consumption and recycling.

Although plastic bags were once highly popular and ubiquitous throughout the country, Eritreans have generally responded positively, while local authorities conduct occasional checks of stores and other businesses to ensure that they are not using plastic bags. Today, Eritreans use cloth, nylon, or straw bags, which tend to be locally manufactured (thus supporting the local economy), and many of the problems associated with plastic bags – such as the blockage of drains and water pipes, the spread of disease, deaths to farm animals and marine wildlife, pollution of the soil and general environment, and contribution to a bleak and disheartening visual landscape – have been dramatically reduced.

WED provides us a useful reminder of the fact that the environment is a blessing and that our nation is only as strong or as healthy as our environment. Now, perhaps more than ever, we must also recognize that we all have a vital role to play in protecting and restoring it.

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea