The Role of Music in Reinforcing Eritrea’s Identity, Consciousness, and Determination

Albert Einstein said, “If I were not a physicist, I would probably be a musician”. A famous musician Madonna, noted, “Music makes the people come together. Music mixes the bourgeoisie and the rebel”.

It sounds like music is the most popular language that helps people find their identity.

This is an attempt to examine how music strengthened the Eritrean identity, raised sociopolitical consciousness and uplifted peoples’ determination to defend national sovereignty.

Eritrea’s coastal location has long been an essential part of its history and culture. Eritrea is an Italianized version of “Mare Erythraeum,” Latin for “Red Sea.” The Red Sea was the route by which Christianity and Islam reached the area in the first millennium. In addition, the Red Sea served as an important trade route to the Pharaonic Egyptians and Ottoman Turks.

Identity is a subpart of culture, and the narrative of the nine nationalities makes up Eritrean Identity: Tigrinya, Tigre, Kunama, Bilen, Nara, Saho, Afar, B’dawyt, and Rashaida.

A picture taken in the 1920s portrays Tigre’s ethnic musical performance. Today, after 100 years, the way they dress up, dance, celebrate weddings, birthdays, and other social events make their narrative expressed by music, for there is no party without music. Some iconic traditional artists of the 1930s and 40s were Mohammad Hiyabu, poet and singer (in B’dawyt), Idris Amir (in Tigre), Adem Idris (Nara), etc.

The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines music as “the art of combining vocal or instrumental sounds (or both) to produce beauty of form, harmony, and expression of emotion.” According to the above definition, Eritrea has a long history of folk music and religious ritual with Christianity and Islam. The nine nationalities in Eritrea have their musical instruments, beats, and rhythms used in their respective localities.

They use different types of instruments, except they have the drum in common. The drum may have a different size, shape, and name, but the drum sets the beat and rhythm in each ethnic group’s traditional music.

Drum is known as Kubbur (Nara), Kalambura (Bilen), Kabro (Afar), Kebero (Saho and Tigrinya). The first Eritrean marching band was established in 1890, almost when Eritrea was constituted as an Italian colonial settler state. With the advent of Italian colonial rule, modern musical instruments were introduced, and skills were learned as an apprentice.

In the early 60s, Eritrean artists incorporated the newly learned trade with the original traditional culture and produced modern Eritrean music. This new contemporary music was heavily influenced by western Jazz and Blues transmitted by “The Rock of East Africa” 24-hour radio station in the U.S. military base at Kagnew Station.

The early Eritrean artist of the 1950s, Mr. Atewebrhan Segid, sang Blues to express malcontent with the sham federation between Eritrea and Ethiopia using “kirar” on stage. The artist openly exposed the Ethiopian conspiracy of divide and rule policy along with a religious and regional basis to control the Eritrean people.

In 1954, Mr. Alemayo Kahsay formed an Indigenous Theater Association and started to teach plays. In 1961, the association developed into Mahber Theater Asmara to standardize music in Asmara. However, it took half a century for the artists to combine traditional instruments with modern equipment. At this time, we have the rebirth of contemporary Eritrean music.

In the 1960s, some notable artists started to protest using metaphor or allegory to get their messages to the people regarding the illegal annexation of Eritrea by Ethiopia in violation of the United Nations approved federal agreement.

The leading artists of that era were: Tewelde Reda with his hit song “Shigey habuni/??? ???” (give me my torch, a metaphor for independence), Tiberh Tesfuhuney (“Eti gezana abi hidmo”/?? ??? ?? ???) allegory for the invading Ethiopian army, Ustaz Alamin Abdelletif (“TsebHi-tsom”/??? ??), and Dr. Bereket Mengesteab (“Kikeyd demo”/???? ??), Eng. Asgedom Woldemichael (“Guma hamra lamey”,/ ?? ??? ???), Yonus Ibrahim “Asmera ketema”/???? ???… etc. Yemane Gebremicael, “Wedebat adey”? ???? ??? and Osman Abdelrahirm, “Ab gezana zelekum”/ ?? ??? ????. In the early 1970s, more artists joined the protest using coded messages to raise the people’s political consciousness. As a result, starting in 1973, many students and workers from the cities joined the armed struggle for independence.

During the armed struggle, in 1976, the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF) realized the importance of music and organized a diversified cultural group from the rank and file of the freedom fighters, including all the nine nationalities Eritrea. In a short time, many skillful musical artists developed from the cultural group. In coordination with the “Voice of the Masses” radio station, transmitted a successful program that uplifted fighter’s morale, recruited young enlists, and reached out to the public at large. Most importantly, music was used to intimidate and demoralize the fighting willpower of enemy soldiers.

Between the 5th and 6th offensives of the Ethiopian army, there was a two year stalemate (circa1979 to 1982). During this period, the liberation front organized many cultural groups, the highest hierarchy being the brigade cultural group. Many famous singers and musicians flourished from the brigade cultural groups, joining the major cultural group. For example, a cultural group of students in a revolutionary school in Sahil named “Keyahti Embaba” (Red Flowers) commenced in 1979. The school produced many young talented musicians. After every performance in villages and small towns, they attracted young Eritreans to join the struggle in large numbers.

After independence, musical art flourished, new training centers for the youth were established to serve the process of national development and in defense of national sovereignty. The Shingrua program is one-of-a-kind training that reaches out to different cities searching for young talents in musical art. In addition, the six regional administrations are assisted in developing a national cultural heritage program that competes annually in the summer national festival in Asmara. Winners are awarded financial incentives.

In brief: The role of musical art before the armed struggle made significant contributions in raising social awareness and gradually enhanced political consciousness among the Eritrean people; when its leadership was exiled or in jail by the successive colonial rulers of Ethiopia.

During the armed struggle, the cultural groups were instrumental in reaching out to the public at large. In addition, their music was used to combat enemy propaganda after independence music continued to serve as a catalyst for nation-building and fight against an existential threat on all borders.

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea

Law and Nation Building

Editor’s Note: This article is prepared by the Ministry of Justice on the occasion of the ‘Law week’ organized by the Ministry.

Nation building is a complicated task that demands total dedication and commitment. A nation built on solid foundations can hold still even during the turbulent of times. Nation building is a process that has to be taken step by step, involving primarily the strength of the youth, the wisdom of the elders and the curiosity of children. Words alone cannot describe the complex nature of building a resilient nation, but there is no doubt that law plays a significant part in nation building.

A glance at Eritrea’s customary laws, both documented and undocumented, helps us understand that they regulated even the smallest details of societal norms. The way one talks, dresses, greets, addresses others and even manners of eating on public occasions were all covered in the customary laws. The society back then looked like its customary laws and the customary laws looked like the society. Law was considered divine and, hence, being obedient to the law was evident. And if there were ambiguities in the law, people would ask for new laws to be issued as soon as possible. It was the duty of every citizen to respect the rule of law. Laws built our identity. We can understand from various Eritrean proverbs that respect for the law was immensely visible.

‘?? ???? ?? ??? ??’ (An arm cut by law, as if is still there)

Subsequent national and international laws had a direct influence in shaping Eritrean history and behaviour. Borders were determined by Italian agreements with imperial Ethiopia. The United Nations decision in December 1950 to federate Eritrea with Ethiopia also did its part.

The usage of customary laws was tolerated by both the Italians and the British but was banned Ethiopian rulers. It is not difficult to imagine the impact that such law-related processes had on the identity and behaviour of Eritreans. The referendum, another pivotal legal process conducted in 1993 when the Eritrean people overwhelmingly voted for independence, is proof of how Eritreans preferred final settlement through legal means. The Eritrean state’s unwavering stand to abide by the decisions and awards of the international tribunals established to settle its border disputes with its neighbouring countries is another testament to such a behaviour.

Law can be considered as the establishing, standardizing and limiting binder of all nation building components. It is not a component, per se, but is the base for other components of nation building. Obedience to the law is a cultural heritage of the Eritrean people that has to be transferred from generation to generation. To succeed in adopting this heritage and adopt it as a national tradition, we have to ask ourselves some questions. How many of us realize that law is a vast topic that goes beyond arguing in courtrooms? Do we have the basic knowledge of our Eritrean laws? Do we still have the national culture of showing ambition to know and abide by our laws? Do we, as in the past, look like our laws and do our laws look like us?

To date, 312 legal instruments, more than 6,000 pages, have been promulgated by the Eritrean government. Law is present in every single activity of building the Eritrean nation. A project to consolidate these national laws has divided Eritrean laws into 39 categories, ranging from the establishment of the government to the processing of international loans, agriculture to health, banking and finance to transportation, public finance to fisheries, environment to labour. By regulating each of these sectors, Eritrean laws serve as the base for the efficient utilization of all the components of nation building.

The consolidation project intends to make the laws available to the public and the international community through print and electronic means available on the Internet. Aggressive public campaign activities need to accompany such efforts to engage the wider Eritrean community not only to know and appreciate Eritrean laws but also to be involved in the justice sector through, for example, an institutionalized process where select cases will be allowed to be settled at the level of the community subject to judicial approval.

At the international level Eritrea has also shown its readiness to engage in matters affecting international relations through, among others, membership to about 130 regional and international legal instruments. It continues to be engaged in regional and international forums where matters affecting regional and international laws and interests are discussed.

It is in this spirit of contemplating the role of law in crafting the Eritrean identity and history as well as its place in the nation-building process that the Ministry of Justice and the wider legal community is conducting a ‘Law Week’ (6-11 of December, 2021) under the theme “Law and Nation Building.” The activities held in the week include seminars, discussion forums, giving free legal services all over Eritrea, webinar with the Eritrean diaspora community, and a public exhibition displaying parts of Eritrean legal history through the use of charts and other visual instruments. A legal knowledge competition has also been held to test the public’s awareness about legal matters. The social activities conducted include blood donation, planting of trees and a cycling competition.

Elementary, junior and secondary school students were brought to the exhibition, shown an animation film prepared especially for them and were allowed to interact about their knowledge and understanding of the law and its role in their lives. Extensive media coverage was given to the ‘Law Week’ which was reported and discussed at the Ministry’s social media account. The message intended to be communicated through this week, which is the beginning of many activities to follow, is clear: Law has been, is and shall continue to be the base of Eritrea’s nation building process, and every member of the Eritrean public needs to maintain the curiosity to know and persist in the age-long tradition of abiding by the law. And once again, the question we need to ask is: “Do we look like our laws and do our laws look like us?”

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea

Remarks by Ms. Amakobe Sande On the Occasion of the International Human Rights Day

Your Excellency Mr. Osman Saleh, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Eritrea;

Excellencies Ministers of Government and Officials of the Peoples’ Front For Democracy and Justice here present;

Your Excellencies Ambassadors, Heads of Missions and Members of the Diplomatic Corps

Members of the UN Country Team in Eritrea and all UN Colleagues,

Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen.

I should like to begin by thanking all of you for turning up this evening as we mark the International Human Rights Day. As always, I wish to sincerely thank you, Minister Osman, for finding the time to be here tonight. We are honoured to have you and all other members of Government as we mark this important day. Thank you all for coming.

A few weeks ago, when we gathered to mark UN Day 2021, I remarked that annual observances, such as the one that brings us here tonight, can at times become routine and ritualistic and, that over time, we may become too accustomed to their messages and purpose. It is for this reason that we must remind ourselves why we are here tonight.

We meet tonight to commemorate the day in 1948 when the United Nations General Assembly adopted a powerful substantive and symbolic instrument, the Universal Declaration for Human Rights (UDHR), as the world was rising out of the ashes of a devastating war, a war that demonstrated all too well the capacity of human beings to deprive and dehumanize each other to the extreme.

It is important that we understand how powerful the UDHR is, particularly if we go back to 1948 when the norm was domination, colonialism, discrimination against women, racism, torture, summary executions, indiscriminate killings of civilians, and other forms of intolerance such as denying the disabled their humanity. This was the norm. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December.

Back then in 1948, sovereign African Countries could be counted on the fingers of one hand, basically Egypt, Ethiopia, Liberia and South Africa. The rest were under colonial rule. At the time, South Africa was not allowed to sign because of the declaration’s stand against racism and all forms of discrimination and segregation

Indeed, strange as it may sound today, few of us would have been able to mingle and share a drink or a laugh, as we are doing here tonight.

We owe the UDHR and its 30 Articles to a group of individuals who were bold, visionary and courageous enough to write in the very First Article that: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”

That statement is as evocative as it is unequivocal. It is our ‘gold standard’ for how we should relate with and treat each other, on the basis of equality and non-discrimination as reflected in today’s theme of International Human Rights Day, which is “Reducing inequalities, advancing human rights.”

Since the adoption of the UDHR on 10 December 1948, every single country that gained independence would invoke the principles of equality, freedom, and justice for all – the same principles embedded in this important document. It became a tool and a reference.

Every Member State of the United Nations has therefore underscored the relevance of the Declaration in their fight for the universal values of human dignity, freedom, justice, and democracy. They all ascertain that the UDHR is proof that equality and friendship between races and nations are possible.

Indeed, the vision of Eritrea, as articulated in the Eritrea National Charter, is “to build a better future for the people of Eritrea … to become a country where peace, justice, democracy and prosperity prevail,” and among others “to perform miracles in peaceful nation-building”.

Perhaps beyond the expectations of its framers, the UDHR has become one of the most influential documents of our time; and has shaped countless national constitutions and international treaties. Thus, all of the human rights treaties that have emerged since – on eliminating discrimination against women, on racial discrimination, on eliminating torture, or on the rights of children – are based on the UDHR. The UDHR is widely recognized as having inspired, and paved the way for, the adoption of more than seventy human rights treaties, applied today on a permanent basis at global and regional levels (all containing references to it in their preambles).

It is recognized as transcending all boundaries – national, race, faith, gender, age, or class – and includes freedom of speech, religion, press, and assembly, the right to education, to work, and to live free from arbitrary arrest, slavery and exploitation. Since 1986, it had been complemented by the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights which emphasizes collective political rights and the right to national self-determination.

The UHDR has gone on to become the most translated document in the world, according to the Guinness Book of Records. That, surely, must say something about the deep resonance of the message of the UDHR: that all human beings everywhere have inalienable rights to which they are inherently entitled, and desire to live in freedom and dignity. To go back again to the first article…… “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights…….

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

Human rights is a process (the UDHR recognizes the “progressive realization of rights’), an aspiration and a goal that Member states have signed up to and which, we in the UN, as servants of the Member States, take very seriously and do our best to promote.

As we take stock of our progress in the promotion and protection of human rights over the last 73 years, we must take pride in the fact that the message of the UHDR remains timeless and as relevant today as it was in 1948.

We must take pride in the fact that the UDHR has become a powerful tool for both citizens and governments in the pursuit and protection of fundamental rights.

We must take pride in how the 30 non-binding articles of the UDHR have spawned a body of binding international human rights covenants, treaties and regional human rights instruments, and influenced national constitutions and laws.

We must take pride in the fact that, today, the majority of the people around the world are aware of and believe in the fundamental truth of the value of Human Rights and Human Dignity; that few would dare say that these are not important or are secondary to other pursuits.

We must take pride in the increased ownership of human rights accountability by UN Member States through the Human Rights Council and procedures such as the Universal Periodic Review (UPR). Through the UPR the human rights situation in every Member State is reviewed on a regular basis, irrespective of which treaties the state has ratified.

We must firmly believe that the failures, ambivalence and double standards that we observe today do not in any way suggest, that the ideals of human rights have somehow become dated or are out of fashion. Failure by others to live to expectations, relativism and economic and political expediency must not be allowed to trump the universal and timeless ideals of human rights, of freedom and of human dignity.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Allow me to acknowledge the active engagement of the State of Eritrea at the Human Rights Council, particularly at the UPR. Since 2009, the Government of the State of Eritrea has received 761 recommendations for all three UPR cycles, and it has made remarkable progress by accepting 595 (almost 60%) of the recommendations. Eritrea’s progress in the area of collective rights, basic services and social protection are commendable.

Eritrea’s presence at the HRC places the country on an important world stage and gives Eritrea an important opportunity to disprove all those who may doubt the country’s commitment by demonstrating human rights in practice at home in every sphere, civil, political, social-economic and cultural and in this regard, the UN welcomes further dialogue and engagement.

The UN takes particular pride in the partnership it has with the Ministry of Justice. But our partnerships with the ministries of Foreign Affairs, Health, Education, Labour and Social Welfare and others, as well as with the National Unions, also included elements of access to justice work. Allow me to particularly commend the Minister of Justice and her team for the “Law and Nation-Building week” initiative which UN Heads of Agencies and I, had the honour to take part in earlier today.

It is evident from our partnerships and from what we learnt a the “Law and Nation-Building week” today that tremendous efforts are being made at reforming the “justice ecosystem” which provide important opportunities. There are of course gaps and challenges and more engagement, including with the Human Rights Special Procedures, would go a long way in further expanding and deepening the required synergy between justice and the rule of law. The UN in Eritrea stands ready to walk with the country to expand our dialogue and actions particularly on the more challenging issues.

Your Excellency Minister Osman, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentleman,

I am particularly proud as we also conclude the 16 days of activism against Gender-Based Violence today that the 50 member states of the UN who came together to draft the UDHR were led by a woman – Eleanor Roosevelt. And that it was infact another woman in the delegation – Hansa Mehta a staunch fighter for women’s rights in India and abroad who is widely credited with changing the phrase “All men are born free and equal” to “All human beings are born free and equal” in Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Allow me to conclude with this important quote:

“Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home – so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighbourhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.’

(Eleanor Roosevelt – 1958, at the 10th Anniversary of the UDHR)

As we celebrate the 73rd anniversary of the UDHR, let us be grateful to its inspired crafters for their foresight in bequeathing us such an enduring instrument.

Let us also recognize that it falls on us and subsequent generations to fulfill the crafters’ dream and to seek to expand, not shrink, the enjoyment of human rights.

Let us redouble our efforts, wherever we are, to work toward the full realization of the timeless ideals of human freedom and dignity through the implementation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights across the globe.

Let us continue to stand up for our rights and those of others. Let’s stand up for equality, justice and human dignity.

Happy Human Rights Day!

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea

Statement by Minister Osman Saleh, On the occasion of the 73rd Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Honorable Ministers, Government Officials, Ambassadors, UN Resident Coordinator and UN Colleagues, distinguished participants

We are gathered today in honoring the 73rd Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. An instrument which lays the foundation for the progressive development of international law in general and specifically Human Rights Law and it is also a historic commitment to the ideals of humanity.

The universal adoption of the document is also a clear reminder and indication of the collective nature of the responsibility to protect, respect and fulfill the ideals and principles of the declaration. No country is a Champion in this respect and every aspiration should be applauded! Despite the economic inequalities, we cannot achieve such novel ideals with criticism, naming and shaming but with partnership and cooperation. We cannot also trade such ideals for narrow geo-political interests and use them as a tool for intervention in the internal affairs of sovereign states.

Globally the Universal Declaration of human rights promise is yet to be fully realized and has stood the test of time in enduring its perennial values to build sustainable peace and development of societies. Every nation faces human rights challenges and recognition of this reality remains an important drive to responsibly contribute to the collective effort of world communities. In this regard, engagement and international cooperation remain a necessity to avoid the politicization of human rights.

Distinguished participants,

In this important occasion I would like to highlight the continued irresponsible use of unilateral sanction by the USA against the State of Eritrea;

It is evident that unilateral sanction imposed on States and their instrumentalities, including high ranking officials violates the basic violation of the fundamental principles of the UN Charter, i.e. sovereignty, self-determination, sovereign equality and respect for the independent exercise of sovereignty of states to freely determine their own form of economic, political, cultural and social development.

Unilateral coercive measures also violate the underpinning principles and purposes of the UN Charter- non- use of force or threat of use of force, peaceful settlement of disputes and development of friendly relations among nations.

It is also a violation of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as well as the right to development. It is also a prima facie violation of the 2004 UN Convention on State Immunity and International Law Commission Draft Articles on State Responsibility, which some of its provision attained the status of Customary International law.

They also constitute wrongful acts entailing international responsibility of both the perpetrating state and those states that are accomplice in its execution and the target state may invoke the rules of state responsibility for international wrongful acts and may be entitled to remedies.

The Vienna Declaration and Program of Action calls upon States:

To refrain from any unilateral measures not in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations that creates obstacles to trade relations among States and impedes the full realization of the human rights set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights instruments, in particular the rights of everyone to a standard of living adequate for their health and well-being, including food and medical care, housing and the necessary social services. The World Conference on Human Rights affirms that food should not be used as a tool for political pressure.

The imposition of unilateral coercive measures is also inconsistent with and violates several General Assembly and Human Rights Council resolutions, without mentioning the details.

Finally, I would like to call upon the UN and its members to exert continuous efforts to uphold the purposes and principles of the Charter and declare all acts of unilateral sanctions illegal and also condemn and take measures against perpetrators of such acts.

I would also like to thank the UN-Eritrea for organizing this important event and for their continuous engagement and support in several areas. I would also like to reiterate Eritrea’s commitment to consolidate efforts in the protection and promotion of human rights and to promote its engagement and cooperation on the basis of mutual respect, understanding and benefit. Eritrea will also support initiatives that maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of the international human rights system.

Source: Ministry of Information Eritrea